Home » Travel Tips » New York’s Passenger Bill of Rights is Law
The Passenger Bill of Rights, which has been a hot topic in the travel industry for the last year is now official in the State of New York. The bill was challenged by the major airlines operating in the United States earlier this week, but Judge Kahn held strong.
The District Court Justice maintained that “It threatens the public health to contain people on grounded airplanes for hours without these necessities.” The press release included a statement from Kate Hanni, who attended the court hearing who asserted, “Clearly the airlines have a callous disregard for the needs of airline passengers during long tarmac delays. It’s incredible that we need a federal court to ensure that their essential needs are met.” I find that hard to believe. I’m pretty sure the airlines do want your repeat business. How else are they going to stay in business. As I mentioned when this issue first came up, many airlines do have internal policies in place mandating the very things the law requires them to provide. I think the incidents with JetBlue and American last winter were the exception, not the rule. I have been delayed on aircraft numerous times throughout my time as a traveler, and I don’t remember ever feeling that my needs were not met. Personally, I believe the airlines should stay at the gate if they know they’ll be delayed, providing passengers access to the terminal if they so choose. However, I don’t think this is always an option.
I, personally, think this should be addressed at the federal level. The airlines operating in the United States do have an obligation to meet the basic needs of their passengers, but I don’t see how it is necessary for a court to make that decision. Will that bill apply to passengers who are stuck on the subway or in a bus in traffic as well? I do have to admit I may just have this opinion because I’ve never had the pleasure of sitting on the tarmac for 6 hours or more.
Whadda ya get with this new bill? You get fresh air, water, food and bathroom access. What are they going to do about fresh air? Open the door? Sounds scary to me. I can’t imagine NOT having drink and restroom access for that long of a time. I have to question the airline staff on those particular flights who denied passengers those things, as I have had access to both on delayed flights in the past.
Who is behind all this? The Coalition for an Airline Passengers Bill of Rights (CAPBOR). CAPBOR is the only non-profit consumer group for airline passengers in the U.S. You have them to thank for your fresh air in New York. If this bill passes in Newark, where will they get the fresh air? Will they have to import it from someplace else?
For more information, check out http://www.flyersrights.org.
Related Posts
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share ![]()
|
I can understand that would be horrid, but did the airline provide you with water and allow you to use the restroom? That’s pretty much all this “bill o’ rights is guaranteeing you.
I was stranded in Philadelphia once because of a missed connection, but the airline gave me a hotel room and a meal voucher. I got to see the Phillies at the Met, so it actually worked out well for me.
I hadn’t heard about a woman left on the tarmac. That is terrible! What was she even doing out there?
Business News
Take it from one who has sat in an airplane on the tarmac for five hours, then returned to Newark airport to spend the night sleeping on the floor with a pillow and blanket compliments of Continental that the ‘needs’ of passengers are not met. Don’t get me wrong - I can sleep on the floor, no problem. The woman in the wheelchair couldn’t. And then more, recently there was the woman in the wheelchair, left out on the tarmac in her wheelchair for five hours. This is the ‘most powerful nation in the world’. Our air traffic control system dates from the 1950s. Do I need to say more?